I’ve written before about the imbecile asshat litigation partner who creates an oppressive environment of constant terror by forcing me to do the substantive work on every single motion/brief/deposition for which he “volunteers.”
One of the blessings of this year’s holiday season has been an intense increase in his ongoing reign of terror over me because his family obligations have left him with little time to do any real work, thus he’s been forcing it all onto me. As a result, I’ve had to suffer through listening to him talk in countless meetings and conference calls during the past month, and I’m starting to notice an overwhelming trend in his speaking habits: he literally never says anything of any real substance. Ever.
The meetings and calls I’ve been on with him pertain to several cases, each with different fact patterns and drastically divergent underlying legal theories. And yet—if you pay close attention—he always gives the same nonspecific nonsense monologues (full of ridiculous and often improperly-used clichés) when called upon to comment on any aspect of these cases.
Somehow, no one else seems to notice. Or if they do, they don’t seem to care. Which raises the question: why the hell am I trying to so hard, while this idiotic baby brain has been able to make a living as a partner on little more than superficial bluffing?
In any event, I’ve made a game out of compiling a list of his most oft-used sentences, which serves two purposes: (i) humorous entertainment value for anyone who has ever been subjected to the cliché-filled non-speak manner of talking that lawyers are so fond of; and (ii) helpful phrases to be used liberally whenever anyone shows up to a meeting unprepared and gets called upon to speak unexpectedly.
Here they are:
1. I’m pretty sure the judge will be inclined to split the baby.
2. You could drive a Mack truck through the hole in that argument.
3. We really can’t risk throwing out the baby with the bathwater, if you know what I mean.
4. Let’s keep in mind that we should pick the low-hanging fruit first.
5. It seems like you guys understand the lay of the land, so I’ll follow your lead.
6. Sure, I can take a crack at it.
7. We might as well tack on an unjust enrichment claim, even though it’s the last refuge of a scoundrel.
8. At the end of the day, it is what it is.
9. I’ve said this all along: they’re trying to put us in a trick box.
10. I don’t know whether or not this is relevant, but it seems like they’re trying to throw cold water on that line of reasoning.
11. Clearly . . . .
12. Obviously . . . .
13. That’s the part I haven’t had a chance to wrap my head around.
14. Think there’s a chance we could throw that idea out there to sweeten the pot?
15. There’s certainly a lot of moving parts.
16. I don’t disagree with you.
17. It’s okay to think outside the box, but be careful not to get too cute with your argument.
18. They’re trying to take a second bite of the apple, aren’t they?
19. But that’s just a red herring, isn’t it?
20. It’s difficult to make up my mind, because all of the elements are so inextricably intertwined.
21. The long and short of it is, this is a slippery slope we’re thinking of heading down.
22. You know what they say: hard cases make bad law.
23. I’m one of the biggest proponents of playing the hand you’re dealt.
24. It’s an exception that proves the rule!
25. Substance over form, form over substance . . . .
Originally Published: Dec 14, 2011